SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

FARJAND ALI
Naurang – Appellant
Versus
LRs of Late Sri Chunnilal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Narendra Thanvi, Mr. Mahendra Thanvi
For the Respondents: Mr. Hemant Jain, Mr. Gaurav Nagda

ORDER

By way of the present Civil Revision Petition No.145/2025, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Sri Ganganagar in Civil Execution Case No.30/2023, whereby the application dated 17.10.2023 preferred by the petitioner–judgmentdebtor raising objections to the maintainability of the execution proceedings was rejected, and the learned Executing Court proceeded further under the provisions of Order XXI Rule 32(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

2. The dispute has its genesis in a civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction instituted by the predecessor-ininterest of the respondents, namely late Chunnilal, before the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Sri Ganganagar, registered as Civil Suit No.566/1995. The suit pertained to agricultural land situated in Chak No.16 ML, Murabba No.10, Kila Nos.1 to 8, measuring 8 Bighas, wherein the plaintiffs sought to restrain the defendants from interfering with their possession and further prayed that any document, such as partition or will executed by Bhinraj in favour of the defendants, be declared void and ineffective.

3. The learned trial court, vide judgment and decree

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top