Back
KAMAL KHATA
Ravi Parthasarathy – Appellant
Versus
Vishpala Parthasarathy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
By the present Application, the Applicant inter alia seeks dismissal of the Caveat filed by the Caveatrix in the Petition. The Petition itself seeks grant of Letters of Administration of the Joint Will and Testament dated 4th November 2018 (Exh.B Page 21 to the Petition) and Joint Codicil dated 31st May 2019 (Exh.B1 Page 33 to the Petition) of the deceased, who were the adoptive parents of the Applicant-Petitioner.
Brief Facts:
2. The Applicant is the duly adopted daughter of Mr. Ravi Parthasarathy and Dr. (Mrs.) Vishpala Parthasarathy (hereinafter jointly referred to as “the said deceased”). The Order of Adoption is annexed at Exh. A, Page 19 to the Interim Application. They expired on 27th April 2022 and 6th November 2023 respectively. The Joint Will dated 4th November 2018 and a Joint Codicil thereto dated 31st May 2019 executed by them are hereinafter collectively referred to as “the said Joint Will”. The Applicant is the sole surviving Class I legal heir and next of kin of the said deceased, under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
3. The Applicant was constrained to file the Petition seeking grant of Letters of Administration in respect of the said Joint Will of the said
(1) Will – A legatee claiming under Will cannot, at the same time, question its validity – Claim must be either by way of inheritance or by way of an interest in estate itself.(2) Nominee being a tru....
A caveator must demonstrate a legitimate interest in the estate that could be prejudiced by the grant of Probate; mere contingent claims do not suffice.
Creditor of deceased undischarged insolvent lacks caveatable interest in probate; estate vests in Official Assignee, probate applies to surplus post-debts. Unexplained delay in condonation applicatio....
A daughter-in-law lacks caveatable interest in her in-laws' estate and must establish a direct legal claim to contest Letters of Administration, especially where legal heirs are not properly disclose....
Revocation of probate not maintainable if challenging testator's title to properties, as such claimant lacks caveatable interest and is stranger to probate proceedings limited to will's genuineness.
No petition for probate filed under Section 276 of the Act. In the absence of any such petition, the court below cannot invoke the provisions under Section 295 of the Act.
The court ruled that failure to disclose necessary parties with caveatable interest justifies revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act.
Beneficiaries of an estate have a caveatable interest in property, and the removal of such caveats must adhere to statutory provisions ensuring equitable distribution among heirs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
