SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJAN ROY, PRASHANT KUMAR
Vinay Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Nidhi Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: In Person

JUDGMENT

Rajan Roy, J.—Heard Shri Vinay Mohan -appellant in person and Shri Vikas Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1.

2. This is an appeal under Chapter VIII, Rules 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 challenging a judgment and order dated 20.05.2025 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in Transfer Application (Civil) No. 166 of 2022.

3. Though, the appellant appearing in person sought to address the Court on merits of the matter, but, first and foremost the question arose as to whether this appeal against the order impugned is maintainable under Chapter VIII, Rules 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 or not ? The aforesaid provision reads as under:-

“5. Special appeal.- An appeal shall lie to the Court from a judgment (not being a judgment passed in the exercise of Appellate Jurisdiction) in respect of a decree or order made by a Court subject to the Superintendence of the Court and not being an order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction or in the exercise of its power of Superintendence or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction or in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top