J. C. DOSHI
Yusufbhai Walibhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
Zubedaben Abbasbhai Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT (CAV)
The captioned batch of revision arise from the orders passed below Exhibit-33 and Exhibit-44 in Special Civil Suit No.132 of 2021 by the 21st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara.
1.1 The two captioned Civil Revision Applications arise from the common order dated 11.10.2022, rejecting the application filed by defendant Nos.1 to 4 and defendant Nos.6 to 11 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) for rejection of the plaint.
1.2 The captioned three Appeal from Orders arise from the order dated 02.02.2024 passed below Exhibit-5, partly allowing the application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of ‘the Code’ by the original plaintiff.
1.3 The above referred CRAs and AOs since were tagged, Honourable Chief Justice by order dated 24.03.2025, placed the AOs along with the CRA before the Court having the roster of Civil Revision Applications.
1.4 In the aforesaid premises, the captioned batch of matters are decided by this common order with the consent of learned Senior Counsel/learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as per their original
Shaukathussain Mohammed Patel v. Khatunben Mohmmedbhai Polara
Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprise Ltd. v. KS Infraspace LLP Ltd.
Kishorsinh Ratansinh Jadeja v. Maruti Corpn.
Anandiben Jamabhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Maharwal Khewaji Trust (Regd.) Faridkot v. Baldev Dass
Ajit Kaur Alias Surjit Kaur v. Darshan Singh (Dead) through Legal Representatives and Ors.
Daya Singh and Anr. v. Gurdev Singh (Dead) by Lrs and Ors.
Salim D. Agboatwala and Ors. v. Shamaji Oddhavji Thakkar and Ors.
Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd. v. Central Bank of India and Anr.
Chhotanben v. Kiritbhai Jalkrushnabhai Thakkar
Neon Laboratories Ltd. v. Medical Technologies Ltd.
Ajambi (Dead) by Legal Representative v. Roshanbi and Ors.
Naseem Kahnam and Ors. v. Zaheda Begum (Dead) by Lr. and Ors.
(1) Rejection of plaint – Party claiming rejection of plaint, has to accept that statement made in plaint is correct – Court cannot grant relief what is not claimed by the party.(2) Mohammedan Law – ....
Inheritance rights under Mohammedan Law are individual, arising only upon death, eliminating claims of joint family property made prematurely based on shared assumptions.
Under Mohammedan Law, co-owners are only tenants in common, and the heirs of a deceased Mohammedan being in possession of the whole estate will be deemed to be in possession on behalf of the other co....
The court ruled that while joint family properties are not recognized under Muslim Law as in Hindu law, acquisitions through joint efforts can establish joint ownership if sufficiently proven.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to prove the nucleus with which property could be acquired under Hindu Law, the application of the principle of lis pendens, and the discr....
Mahomedan law restricts testamentary bequests to one-third of the estate without consent from other heirs, a principle courts erred in evaluating, leading to misjudgment of the plaintiff's rights.
Legal heirs are entitled to inherit property regardless of its ancestral or self-acquired nature, and claims of adverse possession require acknowledgment of ownership by the opposing party.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.