SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJAY DHAR
Abdul Khaliq Sofi – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Shafi Mir – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Malik Mushtaq, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. M. Amin Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

The petitioner through the medium of present petition has challenged order dated 17.11.2025 passed by learned District Judge, Pulwama, whereby appeal against order dated 11.03.2025 passed by learned Sub Judge (Special Mobile Magistrate) Pulwama vacating interim injunction in a suit filed by the petitioner against the respondents, has been upheld.

2. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. M.Amin Khan, Advocate, who is on caveat, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Caveat stands discharged.

3. Heard and considered.

4. It appears that the petitioner (hereinafter “the plaintiff”) has filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against the respondents (hereinafter “the defendants”) before the Court of learned Sub Judge (Special Mobile Magistrate) Pulwama (hereinafter the trial Court). In the said suit the plaintiff has claimed that he has purchased a piece of land measuring 15/12 feet situated at Main Market Shadi Marg on right side of the Shadimarg Keller Road from defendant No.1 for an amount of Rs.4,50,000/- for construction of shop. It has been pleaded that the plaintiff paid an amount of Rs.3,92,500/- to defendant No.1 on 02.12.2009 against a proper receipt, whereafter he con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top