P.NAVEEN RAO
Puli Raju – Appellant
Versus
Government of A. P. , rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare – Respondent
1. It is opt to begin this judgment with following statement of law made by Supreme Court in GUJARAT STEEL TUBES LTD. V. GUJARAT STEEL TUBES MAZDOOR SABHA (AIR 1980 SC 1896):
"146. In the second chapter of our sumup, the first thing we decide is that Article 226, however restrictive in practice, is a power wide enough, in all conscience, to be a friend in need when the summons comes in a crisis from a victim of injustice; and, more importantly, this extraordinary reserve power is unsheathed to grant final relief without necessary recourse to a remand What the tribunal may, in its discretion, do, the High Court too, under Article 226, can, if facts compel, do.........
(Emphasis supplied)
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Medical and Health, Government Pleader for Home and Sri Chandrasekhar, learned counsel appearing for 5th respondent.
3. According to petitioner, his mother Puli Veera Laxmi died on 7.3.2002 in C.K.M. Government Maternity Hospital, Warangal as she was complaining of prolapsed uterus. Having regard to the seriousness of the ailment, surgery was performed on 6.3.2002 and on the same day by evening she complained stomach-ache.
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. V. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha AIR 1980 SC 1896
S.Nambi Narayanan Vs Siby Mathews and others (2018) 7 Supreme 750
Mukkamula Anuradha Vs Prinicipal Secretary to Government, Minorities Welfare Department, Govt of A.P
Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks
Rajalakshmi (Mrs) vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry and another
Banoth Bure Bai v. Secretary, A.P. Residential Educational Institutional Society and others
Kolli Yerukulamma v. Chairman, Visakhapatnam Port Trust
Rudul Sah vs. State of Bihar and another (1983) 4 SCC 141
M.S. Grewal and another v. Deep Chand Sood and others
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board vs. Sumathi and others (2000) 4 SCC 543
Kumari (Smt) vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others (1992) 2 SCC 223
Nilabati Bahera v. State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746
Khadri and others v. State of Bihar
Dr.Laxma Balkrishna Joshi vs. Dr Timbak Babu AIR 1969 SC 128
Achutrao Haribhau Khodwa v. State of Maharashtra (1996) 2 SCC 634
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.