B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
P. Narasimha – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor – Respondent
1. The petitioner by name P.Narasimha is the accused in CC.Nos.784, 794 & 844 of 2012, which are cases maintained against him respectively by T. Naveen Singh in all the cases for the respective offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act that was taken cognizance and are pending before the learned XVIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil.
2. It is after appearance from the summons at post cognizance stage impugning the same he filed the quash petitions with contentions that contents of the very complaint filed respectively by the complainant-2nd respondent are untrue, incorrect and there is no legally enforceable debt and from the very contents of the complaint from the date of alleged issuance of cheque to the date the cheque presented it is beyond 6 months and thereby the 3 cheques in question are outdated and that was also the return by the bank all the 3 cheques are outdated. The other contention is cheques pertain to Axis Bank whereas presented in ICICI bank though to be presented within the jurisdiction of accused banker and thereby the cognizance and continuation of the case proceedings in 3 cases are liable to be quas
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra
K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan
Saketh India Ltd. Vs. India Securities Limited
Haru Das Gupta v. State of West Bengal
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Himachal Techno Engineers & Another (2010) 12 SCC 210
Yogendra Pratap Singh vs. Savitri Pandey
SIL Import, USA v. Exim Aides Silk Exporters
Ishar Alloy Steel Limited Vs. Jayaswals Neco Limited (2001) 3 SCC 609
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.