SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Telangana) 69

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
P. Narasimha – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Ram Murthy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

1. The petitioner by name P.Narasimha is the accused in CC.Nos.784, 794 & 844 of 2012, which are cases maintained against him respectively by T. Naveen Singh in all the cases for the respective offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act that was taken cognizance and are pending before the learned XVIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil.

2. It is after appearance from the summons at post cognizance stage impugning the same he filed the quash petitions with contentions that contents of the very complaint filed respectively by the complainant-2nd respondent are untrue, incorrect and there is no legally enforceable debt and from the very contents of the complaint from the date of alleged issuance of cheque to the date the cheque presented it is beyond 6 months and thereby the 3 cheques in question are outdated and that was also the return by the bank all the 3 cheques are outdated. The other contention is cheques pertain to Axis Bank whereas presented in ICICI bank though to be presented within the jurisdiction of accused banker and thereby the cognizance and continuation of the case proceedings in 3 cases are liable to be quas














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top