SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Telangana) 174

M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
P. Shailaja Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Vasantha Malavika – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Muddu Vijai
For the Respondent: T. Surya Satish

ORDER :

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. This revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 9.3.2018 in IA No. 1486 of 2015 in OS No. 2033 of 2011 of the VIE Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. Petitioner is plaintiff in the suit.

3. She filed the suit against respondents for perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.

4. In the plaint, she claimed that she purchased Acs. 7.00 gts., in Sy. No. 215 ('Aa') of Boduppal Village, Ghatkesar Mandal under a registered sale deed dated 24.9.1966 and when portions of this land were sought to be grabbed by third parties, she instituted LGC No. 45 of 2004 before the Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad against third parties; and in the said L.G.C., the said Court had appointed a Commissioner/Inspector Survey, Office of the Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, Ranga Reddy District to find out in which survey number the LGC scheduled land falls; and the Commissioner then filed a report stating that the plaint schedule property would form part of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top