CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Puskur Vickramm – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Mancherial – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
1. The proceedings dated 30.08.2019 issued by the Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Mancherial, the 1st respondent herein, is challenged before this Court.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the legal heir of one Sri. Puskur Narsing Rao, who was President of the 4th respondent Co-Operative Society. Alleging certain omissions and commissions on the part of the father of the petitioner, enquiries were conducted under Sections 50 and 52 of the Telangana Co-Operative Societies Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act’) and based on the report, liability was sought to be fastened on him on account of the fact that his father passed away on 04.06.2015. It is the assertion of the petitioner that the very notice for conducting enquiry against his father, under Section 52 of the Act, was dated 06.06.2015, hence, the report emanated from the said enquiry itself is null and void and based on such report, no proceedings could have been initiated against him. It is his further case that though the show cause notice was issued on 20.08.2019 invoking Section 60 of the Act proposing to conduct enquiry duly providing time for filing explanation/objections up t
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal
Challa Sanyasinaidu vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies
G. Anasuyamma vs. Kandulapuram Primary Agricultural Society
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.