B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Lantu Chandrashekar S/o. Somaiah – Appellant
Versus
A. Hari Prasad Reddy S/o. A. Bharath Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B. Vijaysen Reddy, J. - This appeal is preferred by the appellant - claimant challenging the order dated 14.12.2010 in OP.No.82 of 2009 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.
2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the claimant claiming compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- on account of the injuries sustained by him in a motor accident.
3. The averments in the claim petition are as follows:
On 16.01.2009, at about 10 AM, while the claimant was proceeding on his motor cycle bearing No.AP 23 M 3203 from Indrakaran Village, the driver of the Bajaj Auto Trolley bearing No. AP 23 W 2808 drove in high speed in a rash and negligent manner and dashed his motor cycle. Due to which, the claimant received fracture of clavicle bone, left occipital bone, head injury and other injuries all over the body. Immediately, he was shifted to Care Hospital, Nampally and he was treated as inpatient from 16.01.2009 to 27.01.2009. The claimant incurred a sum of Rs.30,000/- towards medical expenses. The injuries were not healed and the claimant was not able to perform his normal duties. The Sarpanch of t
Gannmani Anasuya vs. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhary
Iqbal Singh Marwah. vs. Meenakshi Marwah
Karam Chand Ganga Prasad. vs. Union of India
M/S. Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd. vs. M/S. Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) & Anr.
P. Swaroopa Rani vs. M. Hari Narayana @ Hari Babu
Seth Ramdayal Jat vs. Laxmi Prasad
Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam and Anr. vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.