KUNURU LAKSHMAN
Ishoo Narang – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Kunuru Lakshman, J.
1. All these Criminal Petitions, though relating to different crimes but concerning the same petitioners/accused and relating to similar nature of offences, have been considered together and are being taken up for disposal by way of a common order.
2. Crl. P. No. 3966 of 2020 is filed to quash FIR No. 11 of 2018 on the file of CBI, BS & FC, Bangalore. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in the said crime. The offences alleged against them are under Sections - 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 read with 120-B of IPC and also under Section - 13 (1) (d) read with 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'Act, 1988').
3. The very same petitioners have filed Crl. P. No. 3982 of 2020 to quash FIR No. RC0352020A0002 on the file of CBI ACB, Hyderabad. The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in the said crime. The offences alleged against them are under Section - 420 read with 120-B of IPC and under Section - 13 (1) (d) read with 13 (2) of the Act, 1988.
4. The very same petitioners have filed Crl. P. No. 4272 of 2020 to quash the complaint and inv
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sadhu Ram Singla
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303
Gopakumar B Nair v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Indian Oil Corpn. v. NEPC India Ltd.
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur v. State of Gujarat
Ramesh Chandra Mehta v. State of West Bengal
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v. State of Gujarat
Sau. Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar v. The State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.