G.SRI DEVI
Ameena Begum – Appellant
Versus
Koushik Coop Housing Society – Respondent
ORDER :
G. Sri Devi, J.
1. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the order, dated 07.06.2018 passed in I.A. No. 30 of 2016 in O.S. No. 1144 of 1988 on the file of the V-Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein and whereunder the application filed by the petitioner/2nd defendant under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 5767 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree, dated 15.02.1999, passed in O.S. No. 1144 of 1988, was dismissed.
2. The 1st respondent/plaintiff filed O.S. No. 1144 of 1988 against the petitioner/2nd defendant and 2nd respondent/1st defendant for specific performance of contract dated 26.04.1985 in respect of the suit schedule property i.e., the land admeasuring Ac. 2.00 out of Ac. 16.09 guntas, covered by Sy. No. 129/68 Paiki, situated at Shaikpet Village, Hyderabad. The said suit was decreed ex parte on 15.02.1999. The petitioner/2nd defendant filed a petition under Order IX Rule 13 of the C.P.C. for setting aside the said ex parte decree along with the present petition to condone the delay caused in filing said the petition to set aside the ex parte decree. In the aff
Balraj Taneja and another v. Sunil Madan and another
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by L.Rs. v. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and others
Meghmala and others v. G. Narasimha Reddy and others
Ramesh Kumar and another v. Furu Ram and another
Ram Prakash Agarwal and another v. Gopi Krishan (Dead through LRs.) and others
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal and another
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag and another v. Mst. Katiji and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.