B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Gugulothu Nagu – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep By its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Buildings Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
The petitioner applied for the post of Police Constable under ST category in 13th Battalion, TSSP (IR) in the police department, pursuant to notification dated 31.12.2015. The petitioner qualified in the preliminary written examination in April 2016 and later, he appeared in the main examination in the month of October 2016. After qualifying in the main examination, the petitioner was subjected to physical efficiency test by the respondent No.3. The petitioner qualified in the physical efficiency test and was selected provisionally.
2. While so, a show cause notice dated 06.04.2017 was issued against the petitioner alleging that during verification of the antecedents, it was found that a criminal case was pending trial in Cr.No.250 of 2012 under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC on the file of the Malakpet Police Station, Hyderabad. It is stated by the petitioner that the in-charge of the Regional Enforcement Squad of APSRTC gave a false complaint against the petitioner and another person on 08.08.2012 alleging that a complaint was received from the verification in-charge of the bus stop centre at Dilsukhnagar stating that bogus application for student concession bus pass was give
COMMISIONER OF POLICE v. MEHAR SINGH
Management of Reserve Bank of India
DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE v. S. SAMUTHIRAM
R.P. Kapoor v. Union of India [AIR 1964 SC 787]
State of Assam and another v. Raghava Rajgopalachari [1972 SLR 44 (SC)]
Honourable/clean acquittal of by the Sessions Court is sufficient to vitiate the stigma about his involvement in the criminal case involving moral turpitude.
Detention - Petitioner who suppressed the material information in the application form, though disclosed in attestation form placed on record by the learned Government Pleader for Services-I disclosi....
Mere acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically confer a right to appointment in the police service, especially when the acquittal is not a clean one.
An acquittal based on benefit of doubt does not guarantee recruitment to police service; suitability must consider moral character and the nature of prior charges.
Mere acquittal in criminal case does not entitle an employee to reinstatement in service – Acquittal has to be honourable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.