IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD
UJJAL BHUYAN, CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA, JJ.
Smt. Gudupati Laxmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank And 2 Others – Respondents
W.P.No.28291 OF 2021
Decided On : 10-11-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406 and 420 - Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13(2), 17, 17A - Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 69 or 69-A - Enforcement of security interest - Petitioner, a fraud was committed by respondent No.2 on petitioner alluring her to stand as guarantor for loan availed of. Respondent No.2 is in a position to repay the loan amount in full. In such circumstances, petitioner lodged first information before Police Station which has been registered as F.I.R. for offences under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code - This has also been informed to respondent No.1. - Whether allowed or rejected, same has to be communicated to borrower within timeline specified
Findings of the court :
Petitioners have made a request to respondents that in view of unprecedented situation created by pandemic, which has affected life and business of one and all, Section 13(2) notice may be withdrawn and loan account may be restructured - This has to be considered by respondents by taking a reasonable and a pragmatic view, and whatever decision is taken, has to be communicated to petitioners - It would be in interest of justice if petitioner is given liberty to submit a representation or objection afresh to notice issued by secured creditor under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act - We grant liberty to petitioner to file a fresh representation/objection to notice issued by respondent No.1 under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act - If such representation/objection is filed by petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, same shall be considered by respondent No.1 in accordance with law, where after it shall take a reasoned decision, which shall be communicated to petitioner within 15 days of receipt of representation/objection.
Result : Writ petition disposed of.
ORDER:
Ujjal Bhuyan , J.
Heard Mrs.K.Annapurna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to respondent No.1/Canara Bank not to take any steps against her for recovery of dues from respondent Nos.2 and 3 under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (briefly ‘the SARFAESI Act’ hereinafter).
3. It appears that respondent No.2 had obtained a loan from respondent No.1/Canara Bank to which petitioner stood as guarantor. It further appears that respondent No.2 had defaulted in repayment of the loan.
4. Respondent No.1/Canara Bank invoked the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and thereafter issued notice to respondent No.2 as well as to the petitioner under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act on 07.04.2021. Insofar the petitioner is concerned, the notice was addressed to her as the guarantor and she was called upon to repay to the secured creditor a sum of Rs.1,61,71,042.74, failing which it was mentioned that action under sub-section (4) of Section 13 would be taken.
5. Petitioner submitted her objection to the above notice on 31.05.2021. In the said objection, certain factual anomalies were also pointed out, such as loan sanction date and declaration of the loan account as Non-performing Asset (NPA).
6. It is seen that on 05.08.2021, respondent No.1 again issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act stating that it was in supercession of the earlier notice dated 07.04.2021. In this notice, it was mentioned that as per the books of account, the dues payable by the borrower to the secured creditor stood at Rs.1,70,58,724.74 as on 20.07.2021. Because of persistent default of respondent No.2, the loan account was classified as NPA on 16.01.2021.
7. According to the petitioner, a fraud was committed by respondent No.2 on the petitioner alluring her to stand as guarantor for the loan availed of. Respondent No.2 is in a position to repay the loan amount in full. In such circumstances, petitioner lodged first information before the Neredmet Police Station on 08.07.2021 which has been registered as F.I.R.No.440 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. This has also been informed to respondent No.1.
7.1 It is in the above backdrop that the present writ petition has been filed seeking the reliefs as indicated above.
8. Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act deals with enforcement of security interest. Sub-section (1) starts with a non obstante clause having overriding effect over Section 69 or 69-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It says that notwithstanding anything contained in the aforesaid two provisions, any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced, without the intervention of the court or the Tribunal, by such creditor in accordance with the provisions of the SARFAESI Act. As per sub-section (2), in the event of the borrower defaulting in repayment of the secured debt and his account in respect of such debt is classified by the secured creditor as NPA, then the secured creditor may require the borrower by notice in writing to discharge the liabilities in full to the secured creditor. Sub-section (3) clarifies that the notice issued under sub-section (2) shall give details of the amounts payable by the borrower and the secured assets intended to be enforced by the secured creditor in the event of non-payment of secured debts by the borrower.
9. Sub-Section (3-A) of Section 13 is relevant. For ready reference, the same is extracted hereunder:
Point of Law - Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act deals with enforcement of security interest. Sub-section (2) provides for issuance of notice by the secured creditor to the borrower for discharge of lia....
The right of the borrower to make a representation or raise an objection under Section 13(3A) of the SARFAESI Act and the obligation of the secured creditor to consider such representation or objecti....
The right of the borrower to make a representation or raise an objection under Section 13(3A) of the SARFAESI Act and the obligation of the secured creditor to consider such representation or objecti....
The legislative intent to prevent judicial or quasi-judicial intervention at the stage of issuance of demand notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act.
Prematurity of the petition seeking to quash a notice issued under Section 13 (2) of the SARFAESI Act.
The SARFAESI Act provides for the enforcement of security interest by secured creditors and the availability of alternative statutory remedies, emphasizing the non-maintainability of writ petitions a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the non-maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 against proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, and the requirement for the petitioner to ....
The court's decision highlighted the importance of considering representations for repayment within a specified time frame under the SARFAESI Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.