SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 129

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J.
Govindwale Kundhan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No. 15118 OF 2022
Decided on : 24-03-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : ZULFAQUAR ALAM Adv.
For the Respondent: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV TG

The need for respondent authorities to act fairly and in strict adherence to the principles of natural justice in revoking building permissions.

Headnote:

Revocation Order - Building Permission - The court set aside the revocation order and directed the respondents to follow the guidelines issued in a previous case and pass orders in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The Writ Petition questions the inaction of the 4th respondent in considering the representation of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and ultra vires to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Finding of the Court:

The Writ Petition is allowed, setting aside the revocation order dated 06.01.2020. The respondents are directed to follow the guidelines/directions issued by the Court in a previous case and pass orders in accordance with the law. There shall be no order as to costs.

Issues: Inaction of the 4th respondent in considering the representation of the petitioner, legality, arbitrariness, ultra vires to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the respondent authorities to act fairly and in strict adherence to the principles of natural justice. It directed the petitioners to submit their explanations to the objections pointed out in the revocation letters, and the respondent authorities to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of TS-b PASS Act and the Rules made thereunder.

Final Decision: The Writ Petition is allowed, setting aside the revocation order dated 06.01.2020. The respondents are directed to follow the guidelines/directions issued by the Court in a previous case and pass orders in accordance with the law. There shall be no order as to costs.

ORDER :

1. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the 4th respondent in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 14.02.2022, as illegal, arbitrary and ultra vires to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard Sri Zulfaquar Alam, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development and Sri Neeli Ashok Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation. All the learned counsel submit that the issue in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order dated 13.12.2021 in Writ Petition No. 20398 of 2021 and batch, wherein this Court considered the issue at length and at paras 12 and 13 directed as under:

    “12. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that in order to justify the action taken by the respondent authorities in revoking the building permission of the petitioners, they ought to have acted fairly and in strict adherence to the principles of natural justice. However, since the learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the impugned revocation letters passed against the petitioners stand withdrawn to the extent of revocation of permission to construct buildings, the said submission is placed on record. The impugned revocation letters passed by the respondent authorities against the petitioners stand withdrawn to the extent of revocation of permission to construct buildings, in terms of submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader. The petitioners are directed to submit their explanations to the objections pointed out in the impugned revocation letters to the respondent authorities within a period of two weeks from today. On such submission of explanations by the petitioners, the respondent authorities are entitled to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with the provisions of TS-b PASS Act and the Rules made thereunder, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of such explanations. In case, if no orders are passed by the respondent authorities within the time indicated above, there shall be deemed approval of the applications of the petitioners filed for construction of buildings. It is made clear that until passing of orders by the respondent authorities within the time prescribed on the explanations submitted by the petitioners, the petitioners shall not proceed with any type of constructions in their respective subject lands.

13. As regards the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No. 32665 of 2021 that the revocation order was passed without recording any objections, the respondent authorities are directed to bring the objections to the notice of the petitioner therein within a period of one week from today; and on receipt of such objections, the petitioner shall submit his explanation to the said objections within two weeks thereafter; and on submission of such explanation by the petitioner, the respondent authorities are entitled to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of TSb PASS Act and the Rules made thereunder within one week from the date of receipt of such explanation. In case, if no orders are passed by the respondent authorities within the time indicated above, there shall be deemed approval of the application of the petitioner filed for construction of building. It is made clear that until passing of orders by the respondent authorities within the time prescribed on the explanations submitted by the petitioner, the petitioner shall not proceed with any type of constructions in his subject land.”

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is allowed setting aside the revocation order dated 06.01.2020. The respondents are directed to follow the guidelines / directions issued by this Court in Writ Petition No. 20398 of 2021 and batch, dated 13.12.2021 and pass orders in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

4. The Miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top