UJJAL BHUYAN, A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
M. Raghunandan Rao – Appellant
Versus
Telangana Legislative Assembly, Rep. by the Secretary to Legislature, Telangana State Legislature Complex, Hyderabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ujjal Bhuyan, J.
Heard Mr. D. Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants; and Mr. B.S. Prasad, learned Advocate General for respondent No.2.
2. In so far respondents No.1 and 3 are concerned, when the matter was taken up in the morning session, we had issued notice to them to be served by the Registrar (Judicial-II) and to inform them that the appeal would be taken up at 4:00 p.m. today.
3. Registrar (Judicial-II) has submitted a report wherefrom we find that respondents No.1 and 3 have been served. However, when we commenced the proceedings at 4:00 p.m., there is no representation on behalf of respondents No.1 and 3.
4. This appeal is directed against the order dated 11.03.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge, in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.12352 of 2022 declining to grant interim relief to the writ petitioners (appellants herein).
5. Appellants before us are Members of Telangana Legislative Assembly belonging to the political party called Bharatiya Janata Party. They have filed the related writ petition alleging that they were suspended for the remaining period of the ongoing Assembly Session of the Telangana State Legislative Assembly. Prayer was made for a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.