SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 136

A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
B. Bikshapathi – Appellant
Versus
P. Radha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P. Chandra Sekhar Reddy.
For the Respondent: Katika Ravinder Reddy.

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/defendant No. 1 assailing the orders dated 01.06.2017, in I.A. No. 1028 of 2015 in O.S. No. 2616 of 2007, on the file of the learned First Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. This application in I.A. No. 1028 of 2015 was filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with 151 of Civil Procedure Code (for short CPC) for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features and boundaries of suit schedule property.

3. Heard on both sides. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred as plaintiffs and defendants as arrayed in the original suit. The respondents 1 and 2 have also filed a detailed counter.

4. The plaintiffs have filed the original suit O.S. No. 2616 of 2007 for declaration of title and recovery of possession. Originally, the plaintiffs have filed suit in O.S. No. 870 of 2000 for perpetual injunction against the same defendants and that suit was dismissed after full length trial. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs have preferred A.S. No. 251 of 2006, on the file of Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy. During pendency of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top