SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 645

A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
Balamani – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vivek Jain.

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 04.10.2012 in IA No.457 of 2012 in OS No.3653 of 2010 on the file of the learned XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. This application in IA No.457 of 2012 has filed by the petitioners/defendants against the respondents/plaintiffs under Order26, Rule-9 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short ‘CPC’) for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property. Accordingly, that application was allowed. Smt. T. Shailaja Rao is appointed to note down the physical features of the petition schedule property and boundaries along with the help of Surveyor and the Advocate Commissioner was directed to file a report along with photographs on or before 29.10.2012. Aggrieved by the said orders, the respondents/plaintiffs filed this civil revision petition on the following grounds :

    (i) The Court below ought to have seen that the Advocate Commissioner cannot be appointed to collect the evidence;

(ii) The Court below ought to have seen that the Land Grabbing Case filed against the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top