SUVARNA BAI vs A.NARASAMMA - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1611

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1611

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
SUVARNA BAI – Appellant
Versus
A.NARASAMMA – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G DHANANJAI
For the Respondent: S VENKATACHLAM

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction of high court under article 227. (Para 1 , 2)
2. plaintiff's claim regarding property ownership. (Para 3 , 4)
3. defendant's arguments against evidence collection. (Para 5 , 7)
4. trial court's reasoning for appointing a commissioner. (Para 6 , 8)
5. identity of property is crucial in possession disputes. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. need for licensed surveyor in property identification. (Para 12)
7. revision petition dismissed; affirming trial court's decision. (Para 13)

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.1032 of 2017 in O.S.No.1900 of 2010 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

2. Heard Ms.P.Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel representing Sri G.Dhananjai, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Aravind, learned counsel representing Sri S.Venkatachlam, learned counsel for the respondent. The petitioner herein who is defendant in the suit and the respondent herein who is plaintiff in the suit.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff herein filed a suit seeking a decree for directing the defendant to vacate