JUDGMENT:

(Ujjal Bhuyan, J.)

1. Heard Mr. A.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the appellant; Mr. B.Narayan Reddy, learned Senior counsel for respondent No.1 (writ petitioner); and Mr. Harender Pershad, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned Advocate General for respondents No.2 to 5.

2. This intra-court appeal has been filed assailing the legality and correctness of the order dated 19.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.29606 of 2022.

3. Respondent No.1 as the writ petitioner has filed the related writ petition seeking the following reliefs:

It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of Respondent No.4 in-

a. disqualifying the bid submitted by the petitioner submitted in response to the e-NIT. No.8/ ENC(R)/ MDK/ EE(R)/ DEE6/AEE /2022 dated 11.05.2022 and in not giving an opportunity to the petitioner to cure a curable deficiency in the technical bid, despite repeated representations;

b. approving the deficient technical bid of respondent No.5 submitted in response to the