SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 447

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.
Vairagade Babu Rao, S/o. Late Sakaram and Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 32785 of 2022
Decided On : 23-08-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy.
For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Revenue Mr. D. Rajasekhar.

Point of Law : It has become necessary for this Court to examine legal obligation, if any that is cast upon respondents for conducting sub-division survey as and when such request is made by persons concerned.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Power of High Courts to issue Courts - Petitioners that they have approached this Court earlier on two occasions by filing W.P. and also submitted repeated applications for conducting sub-division survey of subject land - Whether it confirms to the documents - Whether records are signed by all concerned parties - Circular instructions issued by the Commissioner are very clear and absolutely there is no ambiguity and the obligation that is cast upon the respondent-Tahsildar is unequivocal and hence, any action on the part of the respondents to refuse to conduct survey and demarcation or sub-division of the part survey numbers pursuant to the request made by the persons concerned by submitting F-Line petitions is totally impermissible and illegal. (Para 11)

Findings of the Court :

In the light of clear legal position, as noted above, the action of the respondents herein in not considering the survey and demarcation of the subject land to an extent of Ac.1.006 gts each owned by the petitioners in Survey is totally unacceptable and such an action cannot be sustained. At the same time, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that no survey was conducted also cannot be accepted. However, this controversy need not be gone into further for disposal of this writ petition.

Result : Petition disposed of.

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, Mr. D. Rajasekhar for the respondents.

2. The grievance of the petitioners in this Writ Petition is that in spite of the repeated requests made by the petitioners for conducting of sub-division survey of the land owned by the petitioners to an extent of Ac.1.006 gts each in Survey Nos.199/A/1/1 and 199/A/2/1 situated at Jankapur Village, Asifabad Mandal, Komuram Bheem Asifabad District, the same is not being conducted by the respondents.

3. It is the further case of the petitioners that they have approached this Court earlier on two occasions by filing W.P.No.35092 of 2018 and W.P.No.4167 of 2021 and also submitted repeated applications for conducting sub-division survey of the subject land. However, in terms of the directions issued by this Court in W.P.No.4167 of 2021, finally the fifth respondent issued notice dated 12.03.2020 for conducting survey on 17.03.2021 but the fifth respondent refused to conduct sub-division survey of the land owned by the petitioners and issued a memo dated 17.03.2021 stating as under:-

    “As per served Notices I have proceeded to Site on dated:17.03.2021 along with Mandal Surveyor, Asifabad and conducted the demarcation in respect of Sy.No.199 situated at Jankapur Village of Asifabad Mandal by showing the boundaries to applicants, side pattedars and panchas and conducted the panchanama in front of applicants and side pattedars and panchulu. The total extent of land in Sy.No.199 is 10.01 Acres/Guntas the panchas are signed on panchanama but the applicants have refused to sign on the panchanama and claiming to demarcate the extent owned by them only in respect of Sy.No.199 to an extent of 2.01 acres/Guntas. Where as the entire extent of full Sy.No. is 10.01 Acres/Guntas and there is no sub-division in the records/Map.

In view of the claim of petitioner for demarcation of land owned by them separately could not be considered and for consideration of claim they have to apply for sub-division which could be considered subject to actual possession only.”

4. Thereafter, the petitioners claim to have submitted another application through challan No.6100953952 dated 29.06.2021 requesting for sub-division survey of the land owned by the petitioners, which is the subject matter of this Writ Petition. But the respondents have not taken any action on the said requisition submitted by the petitioners and hence, the petitioners approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition.

5. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that though the respondents are under obligation to conduct sub-division survey of the land owned by the petitioners, the respondents are not taking any steps for conducting of such sub-division survey number and they are only confining the survey in respect of the entire survey number. Thereby, the petitioners are deprived of getting the fixation of boundaries and demarcation of the land owned by the petitioners. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for passing appropriate orders directing the respondents to conduct sub-division survey. Learned counsel for the petitioners also placed reliance on an order passed by this Court in W.P.No.33290 of 2013 dated 21.11.2013 for conducting sub-division survey.

6. The matter came up for consideration on 22.08.2022 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader informed this Court that the Mandal Surveyor from the office of the fourth respondent has already issued a notice vide reference No.B/387/2021 dated 16.08.2022 proposing to conduct survey of the subject land on 22.08.2022. In view of the same, the matter is directed to be adjourned today i.e. 23.08.2022 and when the matter is taken up today, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that though notice was issued for conducting survey, the respondents have not conducted survey on the ground that the present Writ Petition i

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top