UJJAL BHUYAN, SUREPALLI NANDA
M. Hari Prasad Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Authorised Officer Union Bank of India – Respondent
ORDER :
Ujjal Bhuyan, J.
Heard Mr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, learned senior counsel representing Mr. Ch.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K.Lakshmi Narasimha, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to respondent No.1 to issue confirmation of sale after withdrawing letters dated 08.10.2020 as well as 13.10.2020.
3. Case of the petitioner is that petitioner is engaged in software business with interest to make investment in real estate. Respondent No.1 issued e-auction sale notice dated 22.01.2020 for sale of the schedule properties. It may be mentioned that the schedule properties were furnished as security for the loans availed of by respondent No.2. As respondent No.2 committed default in repayment of loan, respondent No.1 invoked provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (briefly ‘the SARFAESI Act’ hereinafter) and consequently issued the e-auction sale notice. There were three schedule properties i.e. Lot ‘A’, Lot ‘B’ and Lot ‘C’.
4. Petitioner was interested in Lot ‘A’ property for which the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.