Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
M. Prashant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director – Respondent
ORDER:
1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Counsel for the respondents.
2. This writ petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order of Termination from service issued in Proc.No. E2/1(34)/2009-ZHB, dated 23.09.2009 and 2nd respondents Proc.No. PA/675 (45)/2010 -RM:MR dated 26.02.2011 is so far as not granting the continuity of service, attendant benefits, as arbitrary & unjust and consequently direct the respondents into service with continuity of service, attendant benefits and back wages.
3. The case of the Petitioner in brief, is as follows:
(b) While Working under the 3rd respondent, petitioner fell sick on the count of Chicken Gunia from 21.05.2009 and the same had been intimated to the 3rd respondent, requesting grant of leave.
(c) The Petition
The punishment imposed should meet the standards of fairness and be in strict compliance with principles of natural justice.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of conducting a regular enquiry and following the principles of natural justice before imposing major punishment in service matt....
The right to receive the enquiry report and a second show-cause notice is a fundamental aspect of the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings, and failure to provide these rights in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
