SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 517

P. SREE SUDHA
Regional Manager Central Bank of India, Warangal – Appellant
Versus
Kataram Narasaiah – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C.V. Rajeeva Reddy.
For the Respondent: Deva Ravi Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

P. SREE SUDHA, J.

1. Aggrieved by the Judgment in O.S. No. 331 of 1991 passed by I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal on 15.04.1999, the Appellant/Plaintiff filed this Appeal Suit.

2. Central Bank of India, Warangal filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,08,771.45 ps. with interest @ 16½% per annum with quarterly rests against the defendants. The Trial Court considering the evidence on record and arguments of both sides decreed the suit against defendant Nos. 6 and 7 with costs and dismissed the same against defendant Nos. 1 to 5, 8 and 9.

3. Aggrieved by the said order, the plaintiff in the suit preferred this appeal and contented that the Judgment of the Trial Court is erroneous. The Trial Court failed to seek that defendant Nos. 1 to 4 acted bonafidely while transacting with defendant Nos. 6 and 7. The onus is on the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 to prove such bonafidity. Though defendants have not examined anyone to prove their case, the Trial Court without evidence on record on behalf of the defendants erroneously passed Judgment only against defendant Nos. 6 and 7. When the Demand Draft was endorsed by defendant No. 7 to defendant No. 1-firm and defendant Nos. 1 to 4 inten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top