Back
P. NAVEEN RAO, SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
K. Niranjan Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Sambasiva Rao Naidu, J.]
1. Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree of I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, dated 15-03-2018 in Arbitration O.P.No.101 of 2010 by which their request for setting aside the Award dated 09-08-2007 passed by the learned Arbitrator in respect of Claim No.7 and costs of Arbitration was negatived, the petitioners in the said Arb.O.P.No.101 of 2010 and respondents in Arbitration application No.7 of 2004 preferred the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal on various grounds:
2. Before going into the merits of the appeal and grounds on which the present appeal is filed, it would be necessary to look into the details of said Arbitration Application, Award passed by the learned Arbitrator, petition in Arbitration O.P., and order therein.
3. Prior to 1990, the Railway Board took a decision to run the trains on a track free from harsh sounds, bumps and jerks which occur at the joints of rails. A policy was evolved to join the rails through welding process so that there will not be any joint between the rails, which generally cause
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Arbitration Act, 1996 does not permit the Court to sit as an Appellate Court to find defects in the award. Additionally, the Arbitrator ha....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grounds for setting aside an arbitral award are limited and must fall within the scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A....
The Ld. Arbitrator's jurisdiction, the applicability of Clause 16(2) of the Agreement, and the sufficiency of reasons provided in the award were the main legal points established in the judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Arbitration Act 1940, specifically regarding the arbitrability of disputes and the influence of specific ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope for interference with arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the discretion of the Arbitrator in a....
The courts have a limited scope of interference under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act, and the Arbitral Tribunal's detailed consideration of evidence and claims is final.
The principle of party autonomy is crucial in arbitration proceedings, and the Arbitral Tribunal cannot impose its will and wishes without reason or cause.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
