SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 546

P. SREE SUDHA
S. Yamini Vally – Appellant
Versus
Sashi Kumar Khanna – Respondent


ORDER :

1. This civil revision petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 19.12.2019 passed in I.A.No.816 of 2016 in O.S.No.848 of 2012 on the file of the learned VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. The petitioners herein are defendant Nos.2 and 18 in the suit. They filed an application viz., I.A.No.816 of 2016 in the suit under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the petition to set aside the order. In fact, O.S.No.848 of 2012 was filed for declaration of title and for injunction. The petitioners herein could not cross-examine P.W.1 and as such they were set ex parte on 20.01.2016. Thereafter, the matter was posted for arguments on 01.02.2016 and judgment was passed on 22.02.2016. The petitioners would further state that the first petitioner is staying at Vijayanagaram and the second petitioner is staying at Hyderabad. Due to the ill health they could not contact their counsel and the counsel not even applied for certified copies and on their instructions the counsel applied for certified copy on 21.04.2016 and the same was received on 13.05.2016 and collected the same on 08.06.2016 and c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top