SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Bhagya Nagar School of Nursing – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana and Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 39698 of 2022
Decided On : 24-03-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K. Anantha Rao.

Point of Law: Court is of firm opinion that without issuing any notice to Petitioner Institution for withdrawal of permission granted there cannot be any unilateral denial of renewal in the year 2022.

Headnote:

Training and Grant of Permission to Private Schools of Nursing) Rules, 1997 - Rule 12 - Andhra Pradesh Nursing and Midwives (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1964 - Rule 38 U/s. 11 (2)(b) - Andhra Pradesh General Nursing Training Institutions (Admissions into General Nursing - Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Lease deed - Certified copy - Petitioner institute has been established in Hyderabad after obtaining due permission by Government of Andhra Pradesh in year vide orders G.O.Ms. Health Medical and Family Welfare (K1) Department - The 3rd respondent had issued a notice vide LR to petitioner asking to produce a certified copy of registered lease deed - Upon producing sale deed, 3rd respondent had been insisting that 30-year lease deed should be a registered sale deed, which is illegal and improbable and illegal - 2nd respondent had issued a admission notification vide RC, notifying the Nursing Schools in which admission could be obtained by students seeking admission into GNM Course - A bare perusal of the contents of the counter affidavit filed by 3rd Respondent, in particular Paras 13 and 18 (extracted above) does not clearly indicate specific violation of Government Orders and norms fixed by the Indian Nursing School by the Petitioner herein.

Findings of the Court:

Petitioner’s Institution admittedly had a renewal of recognition in its favour even in year 2021 - Admittedly as borne on record petitioner’s institution since the year 2004 i.e., 13.12.2004, had renewal of recognition periodically till year 2021, and the latest renewal was in process but however when Petitioner’s Institution was declined admissions unilaterally into General Nursing and Midwifery Training Course for academic year 2022-2023, Petitioner herein is constrained to approach this Court by filing Writ Petition - Court opines when admittedly as borne on record petitioner’s Institution had been functioning continuously since 13.12.2004, at this stage Respondents cannot decline admissions into General Nursing and Midwifery Training Course for the academic year 2022-2023 to petitioner herein unilaterally, illegally and irrationally - Court is of firm opinion that without issuing any notice to Petitioner Institution for withdrawal of permission granted there cannot be any unilateral denial of renewal in year 2022 and said exercise of power by Respondents herein in present case is manifestly arbitrary and opposed to principles of natural justice.

Result: Writ Petition is allowed.

ORDER :

1. Heard learned senior counsel Sri K. Ananta Rao for the Petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare on behalf of the Respondents.

2. The main prayer sought for by the Petitioner is as follows:

    “To issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not including the petitioner school of Nursing in the list of Nursing Schools for admissions into the general nursing and midwifery training course issued in R.C. No. 34792/N1/2022 dated 01.10.2022 and the order extending the time for admissions issued in R.C. No. 34792/N1/2022 dated 15.10.2022 as being without jurisdiction and even though the petitioner has valid permission of the government for running the school is arbitrary, illegal and untenable in law and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to allow the school to function normally and allow the school to take admissions of students for general nursing and midwifery training course for the academic year 2022-2023 and by setting aside the action of the 2nd respondent in not including the petitioner Nursing School in the list bearing R.C. No. 34792/N1/2022 dated 01.10.2022 and the order extending the time for admissions issued in R.C. No. 34792/N1/2022 dated 15.10.2022 declaring the same to be without jurisdiction.”

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:

    (a) The petitioner institute has been established in Hyderabad after obtaining due permission by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in the year 2004 vide orders G.O.Ms. No. 579 Health Medical and Family Welfare (K1) Department dated 13.12.2004.

(b) The 3rd respondent had issued a notice vide LR No. TSNMC/GNM/3043/2021 dated 29.09.2021 to the petitioner asking to produce a certified copy of the registered lease deed. Upon producing the sale deed, the 3rd respondent had been insisting that the 30-year lease deed should be a registered sale deed, which is illegal and improbable and illegal.

(c) The 2nd respondent had issued a admission notification vide RC No. 34792/N1/2022 dated 01.10.2022, notifying the Nursing Schools in which admission could be obtained by the students seeking admission into GNM Course.

(d) In the eligible list of Nursing Schools in the said notification, the name of the petitioner school had not been mentioned and upon enquiry with the 3rd respondent, it had been orally communicated that since the petitioner school had failed to produce the registered sale deed from the owner of the school premises, the name of the petitioner’s school had not been mentioned and is not eligible to take fresh batch of students for the academic year 2022-2023 in the said Notification i.e. RC No. 34792/N1/2022 dated 01.10.2022.

(e) The petitioner after issuance of the said notification, had made repeated representations requesting the 3rd respondent to include the name of the petitioner school in the list of eligible school’s to take fresh batch of students for the academic year 2022-2023 but the same had not been ignored completely ignored by the 3rd respondent.

(f) Neither the Government not the Indian Nursing Council had stipulated that the schools running in the rented premises should have a registered lease deed for a period of 30 years and the action of the 3rd respondent in not including the petitioner’s school for admission into the GNM course is illegal.

(g) Indian Nursing Council is a body which regulates the syllabus and methodology of teaching nursing courses for the schools established throughout the country. Indian Nursing Council does not have the authority to grant recognitions to the institutes imparting Nursing courses and the same has been held by the Karnataka High Court in a batch of cases.

(h) The State Council has no authority to say that a 30 years registered lease deed is required for inclusion of a school in the list of institutions for taking admissions into GNM

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top