IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Sarath, J.
K.Ramu S/o Krishnamurthy - Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and three others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4618 of 2008 and 4760 of 2009
Decided On : 15-03-2023
A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 - Agricultural land - Registration - Sale deed - Assigned Land - Petitioner has purchased agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2.35 guntas in survey No.131/2, Vettinagulapalli Village, Rajenderanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from its lawful owner Sri Pattela Nageshwara Rao through registered sale deed dated for a valuable consideration - Vendor of petitioner purchased same from its original pattedar Sri Dasari Rajaiah through a registered sale deed dated - At time of purchasing, petitioner got verified revenue records and also verified with the registration authorities i.e., District Registrar, Ranga Reddy before purchasing the same as to whether there is any prohibition of registration either under A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 or under any other proceedings or law - Registering authority has informed that land is not an assigned land - Being satisfied in all aspects, petitioner purchased said land from his vendor - Whether there is any prohibition of registration either under A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 or under any other proceedings or law - Learned counsel for petitioners further submits that Respondent No.1 has passed the impugned orders even without looking into the survey number of subject land in issue - Respondent No.1 has left all the blanks while answering issue 2 and 3 with respect to file number of assignment. Para 9
Finding of Court :
provisions of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (Act No.9 of 1977) will no application to the alienation of pattas/occupancy rights granted under Laoni Rules or under Revised Assignment Policy issued in G.O.Ms.No.1406 dated - Since said Act prohibits tranjsfer of assigned land which is defined under Section 2(1). Laoni Rules as well as rules issued under G.O.Ms.No.1406 dated deal with two types of assignments, i.e., assignment on payment of market value and assignment to landless poor persons. - In instant case, respondents have not followed Rules, contemplated under Telangana Assigned Land (POT) Act, 1977 and without any notice to petitioners and without any application of mind passed resumption orders prepared by office of respondent No.1, and same were upheld by the appellate authority i.e., respondent Nos.2 and 3 - In view of same impugned orders of resumption of the subject lands issued by the respondent No.1 in Proc.No.B/6960/2/2004 dated
Result : Both the Writ Petitions are allowed.
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri A.Venkatesh for Sri Satha Karni, Learned counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions, and Sri Harender Pershad, Learned Special Government Pleader for Advocate-General appearing for the respondents.
2. Since the issue involved in both the petitions is one and the same, both the petitions heard together and being disposed by this common order.
Case of the petitioner in WP No.4618 of 2008
3. Learned counsel of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2.35 guntas in survey No.131/2, Vettinagulapalli Village, Rajenderanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from its lawful owner Sri Pattela Nageshwara Rao through registered sale deed dated 19.10.2000 for a valuable consideration. The vendor of the petitioner purchased the same from its original pattedar Sri Dasari Rajaiah through a registered sale deed dated 04.02.1993 and 08.06.1993. At the time of purchasing, the petitioner got verified revenue records and also verified with the registration authorities i.e., District Registrar, Ranga Reddy before purchasing the same as to whether there is any prohibition of registration either under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 or under any other proceedings or law. The registering authority has informed that the land is not an assigned land. Being satisfied in all aspects, the petitioner purchased the said land from his vendor. While it being so, the Respondent No.1, without issuing any notice to the petitioner issued resumption proceedings under A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 in respect of the suit scheduled land through Proc.No. B/6960/2/2004 dated 21.06.2005 on the ground that land is an assigned land and the same has been transferred to the petitioner in violation of the conditions of assignment.
Case of the petitioner in WP No.4760 of 2009
4. Learned counsel of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1.20 guntas in survey No.130/2, Vettinagulapalli Village, Rajenderanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from its lawful owner Sri Pattela Nageswar Rao through a registered sale deed dated 19.10.2000 for a valuable consideration. The vendor of the petitioner purchased the same from its original pattedar Sri Mangalram Laxmaiah, registered sale deed dated 01.11.1992. At the time of purchasing, the petitioner got verified revenue records and also verified with the registration authorities i.e., District Registrar, Ranga Reddy before purchasing the same as to whether there is any prohibition of registration either under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 or under any other proceedings or law. The registering authority has informed that the land is not an assigned land. Being satisfied in all aspects, the petitioner purchased the said land from his vendor. While it being so, the Respondent No.1, without issuing any notice to the petitioner issued resumption proceedings under A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 in respect of the suit scheduled land through Proc.No. D/2354/2002 dated 14.10.2005 on the ground that land is an assigned land and the same has been transferred to the petitioner in violation of the conditions of assignment.
5. Learned counsel of the petitioners submits that the petitioners in both the petitions purchased agricultural lands admeasuring from its lawful owner Sri Pattela Nageshwara Rao through registered sale deeds dated 19.10.2000 for a valuable consideration. The vendor of the petitioner in WP No.4618 of 2008 had purchased the same from its original pattedar Sri Dasari Rajaiah through a registered sale deed dated 04.02.1993 and 08.06.1993, and vendor of the petitioner in W.P.No.4760 of 2009 purchased from its original owner Sri Mangalaram Laxmaiah. At the time of purchasing, the petitioners got verified revenue records and also verified with the registration authorities i.e., District Registrar, Ranga Reddy befo
Letter sent from Plot No.338 and Other Versus The Collector and District magistrate and Others
Joint Collector and Others Vs P harinath Reddy and Others
SunkaraSujana Versus District Collector & Others
Point of Law : If land assigned to landless poor persons under Laoni Rules, there must be condition of non-alienation as per settled law, otherwise it cannot be declared as void transaction.
Point of law : Registered sale transaction in respect of the subject land on different occasions of petitioner’s predecessors in title established that the subject land was treated as free hold land.
The court established that adherence to procedural requirements in eviction proceedings under the A.P. Assigned Land Prohibition of Transfers Act is essential for the validity of such orders.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that authorities must establish that land is assigned with a condition prohibiting alienation before initiating proceedings under the A.P. Assigned....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of stating the nature of assignment and the conditions of non-alienation while initiating proceedings under the Andhra Prad....
Assigned Land - Resumption proceedings maintainable - Act contemplates taking action at any point of time soon after it comes to the knowledge of the officials about the contravention of the provisio....
Assigned land sold in auction by Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society is ceased to be assigned land on its sale.
The absence of a non-alienation clause in the original land assignment means it cannot be classified as assigned land under the A.P. Assigned Lands Act, allowing for its registration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.