Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Anjana Sravani Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard the learned Counsel for petitioner and the Learned Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare.
2. The prayer pleaded by the petitioner in the present writ petition is as follows:
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
a) The petitioner is a Diet Contractor and had participated in the e-tender notice Bid No GEM/2021/B/1636730, dated 02.11.2021 to provide Health Care and Kitchen Dietary Services in ESIC Super Specialty Hospital for a period of one year from 01.01.2022 to 31.12.2022 and the said bid had been awarded to petitioner as successful bidder. Since then, the petitioner had been providing satisfactory services to the patients
Point of law : Before proposing to pass a black listing order or debarring orders the parties had to be given hearing followed by an appropriate reasoned order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a fair hearing, specific show cause notices, and proportionate punishment before imposing blacklisting in government contracts.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of fair play, natural justice, non-discrimination, equality, reasonableness, and proportionality in the process of blacklisting, and the need for a valid, parti....
The impugned actions of issuing the show cause notice and blacklisting the petitioner were arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violated principles of natural justice. The court emphasized the requiremen....
The requirement for a fair hearing and a specific show cause notice before imposing the severe civil consequence of blacklisting, and the need for the authority to determine the period of punishment ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
