ORDER :

1. Aggrieved by the issuance of the proceedings in Lr. No. EE/SYP/Dn.3/Estt/ECI/41/M/1No dated 03.02.2012 and Lr. No. SE/SYPC/MNCL/ATO- 3/190/4 dated 04.05.2012 rejecting the claim of the petitioners for adjustment charges with regard to labour and other materials, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area Development for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the respondent No. 1 has entered into an agreement with petitioner No. 1 vide Agreement Bond No. L.S.1/2005-06 dated 03.04.2005. Learned counsel, while drawing the attention of this Court to the terms and conditions of the contract, more specifically, clause 13.8.1 thereof, has stated that the official respondents instead of implementing the said clause, in toto, have denied some of the benefits to the petitioners and restricted the price adjustment only for cement, steel and fuel, and have rejected the benefit of the said clause for the labour and other material, based on the Government Memo No. 30250/Maj.Irr.III/A2/2007-6, dated 16.11.2009 said to have been issued by the Governm