MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Y. Ramalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Sri Rapolu Baskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration and Sri Y. Krishna Mohan Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.3 to 6.
2. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.2 in entertaining the registration of cancellation deed dated 28.05.2014 vide document No.1728 of 2014, thereby cancelling the Development Agreement – cum – General Power of Attorney (for short ‘DAGPA’) dated 05.03.2009 vide document No.2040 of 2009 as illegal and arbitrary.
3. The admitted facts are that the respondent Nos.3 to 6 herein have executed a registered DAGPA dated 05.03.2009 vide document No.2040 of 2009 in favour of the petitioner herein in respect of land situated in various survey numbers of Motighanpur Village, Balanagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District with various terms and conditions, creating rights and obligations on either of the parties to the document. The said registered DAGPA was cancelled by the respondent Nos.3 to 6 herein by executing and registering the cancellation deed dated 28.05.2014 vide document No.1728 of 2014 on the ground that the petitioner herein failed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.