Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
G. Ashok S/o Veeraiah – Appellant
Versus
Northern Power Distribution Company of A. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Government Pleader for Higher Education and Learned counsel for Respondents.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari by calling the records relating to the Memo No. SE/OP/Wgl/Estt./VI-D.No. 1844/04 dated 27.10.2004 on the file of 2nd respondent and as confirmed in Memo No. CGM (HRD)/GM(S)/AS(III)/J1/F.No. 286-D/04-7dated 31.01.2005 on the file of 1st respondent and quash by holding the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service by granting all consequential and attendant benefits.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief, is as follows:
(b) All 4 (Four) charges
The court ruled that failure to follow prescribed disciplinary procedures invalidates termination, emphasizing the necessity of fair process in disciplinary actions.
The court emphasized that a disciplinary order must provide clear reasoning; failing this, the order is unsustainable and violates principles of natural justice.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific and proven charges, adherence to procedural rules, and consideration of the petitioner's explanation in disciplinary proceedings.
The disciplinary authority must provide reasons for disagreement with the inquiry report, record its own findings on the charges, and provide the government servant with an opportunity to file a writ....
Authorities must provide reasoned decisions, avoid pre-judging issues, and adhere to principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
