Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
SEW Kranthi JV – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri A. Venkatesh appearing for the petitioner and the Special Government Pleader Sri. A.Snajeev Kumar appearing on behalf of the Respondents.
2. The Main Prayer sought for by the Petitioner:
Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is also a Court of Equity It will have to be mindful of interests of justice and ensure that in rigidly applying technical....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the dispute fell within the ambit of the arbitration clause in the contract and that the public law remedy was not required as an effective pr....
The court emphasized the importance of honoring contractual agreements and the need for parties to adhere to the terms of the contract. It also highlighted the significance of approaching the compete....
The court affirmed that contractual obligations must be honored when supported by competent authority approvals and committee recommendations, reinforcing the binding nature of such decisions.
A writ petition is not the appropriate remedy for disputes relating to contractual obligations. Such disputes should be resolved through civil suits.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
