SUREPALLI NANDA
S. K. Swamy and Company – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri A. Sudershan Reddy, the learned Senior designate counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner, the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Smt. Anjali Agarwal appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
3. PERUSED THE RECORD:
Approval o
Unitech Ltd. & Others Vs. Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) & Others
M/s. Radhakrishnan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Magadh Sugar and Energy Limited Vs. State of Bihar and Others
Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is also a Court of Equity It will have to be mindful of interests of justice and ensure that in rigidly applying technical....
A writ petition is not the appropriate remedy for disputes relating to contractual obligations. Such disputes should be resolved through civil suits.
The jurisdiction of the court under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be ousted by an agreement executed between the parties.
Contractual agreement - Whether existence of arbitral agreement between parties that High Court of Delhi alone will have jurisdiction to try dispute arising out of contract is enforceable in law - Un....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.