IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Jakkula Srinivas Reddy and others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Telangana and others - Respondents
W.P. No. 24352 of 2020
Decided On : 09-02-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14, 21 and 300-A - Surplus course/catchment area water flow - Restoration and re-sectioning of existing surplus channel - Respondent issued respondent No. 3 to demark the surplus course from village as per the alignment shown in topo sheet - 2 respondent proceedings 3" respondents taken steps with the help of Sarpanch and Executive Officer of village and completed restoration of existing surplus channel - Held, Petitioner's land in Survey Village and Mandal, District by virtue of work undertaken by respondents for restoration of surplus channel 2nd respondent and in pursuance resolution Village and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order duly communicating the decision to petitioner - Writ Petition is disposed of
ORDER :
Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Irrigation Department.
THE PRAYER SOUGHT FOR BY THE PETITIONER IN THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION IS AS FOLLOWS :
2. The Petitioners filed this petition to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondents 2, 3 and 6 in taking the Canal through the lands of the Petitioners herein situated in Sy. No.s 519, 521, 538, 130 and 131 of Manoharabad Village and Mandal Medak District as illegal arbitrary and unfair and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and opposed to the principles of natural justice and consequently restrain the Respondents No.2 and 3 from laying the Canal through the lands of the Petitioners herein without following due process of law.
3. The Counter Affidavit filed by Respondents No.1 to 3 and the relevant paras 18, 19 and 20 are as follows :
Para 19 : That the 2 respondent issued proceedings No: EE/IB/MDK/556, dt: 15.09.2020 directing the respondent No. 3 to demark the surplus course from Yellamma Cheruvu to feed Pedda Cheruvu of Ramaipalli village as per the alignment shown in the topo sheet. As per the 2 respondent proceedings the 3" respondents taken steps with the help of Sarpanch and Executive Officer of Manoharabad village and completed the restoration of existing surplus channel (vaagu) near by the lands of the petitioner.
Para 20 : It is further humbly submitted that the discharge of the Yellamma cheruvu is 66.00 cumecs. That there is no new excavation of channel is undertaken and it is only a restoration and re-sectioning of existing surplus channel as per topo sheet No. 56K/5, about 30-meter width existing Weir, old channel up to SC Colony and existing National Highway 44 bridge is undertaken and completed. The said restoration and re-sectioning work was completed much prior to the filing of the present writ petition by the petitioners before this Hon'ble Court.
4. Additional Counter Affidavit filed by Respondent No.2 in W.P.No.24352 of 2020, in particular, Paras 2, 3, 4 and 5 read as follows :
Para 3 : There exists a natural surplus channel
The court established that extraordinary jurisdiction is not a substitute for civil law remedies in property disputes, especially when public safety is at stake.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of technical aspects and feasibility in disputes over irrigation facility and water rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.