Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Wynn Homes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri B.Chandrasen Reddy for the Petitioner, G.P. for Panchayat Raj and the learned Government Pleader for Irrigation.
2. The Petitioner filed this petition seeking Writ of Mandamus with prayer is as follows:
3. Counter Affidavit filed by the Respondents No. 1 to 3, in particular, paras No. 9, 10 and 11 read as under:
Fields of parties has been continuing for last 32 years, and thus, after lapse of such a long period, petitioner cannot raise any objection.
The Court established that while private development is permissible, entities must ensure no interference with public irrigation infrastructure and are liable for restoring damages caused by their ac....
Disputed factual issues must be adjudicated in civil courts, not through a writ under Article 226.
Encroachments on public drainage systems are impermissible and must be removed to protect public health and safety.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
