JUDGMENT :

CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA, J.

1. In disagreement with the findings given and the consequent sentence passed, the appellant, who is the accused in Sessions Case No. 306 of 2011 that stood pending on the file of the Court of V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad, is before this Court.

2. Heard Sri S. Chandrasekhar, learned counsel for the appellant, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor who represented the respondent-State.

3. Making his submission, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant had no intention whatsoever to attack his mother-in-law and cause her death and indeed, the prosecution miserably failed in establishing the guilt of the appellant beyond all reasonable doubt. Learned counsel further submitted that the appellant equally had no intention to attack his wife and his daughter and absolutely, there is no evidence on record to show that the appellant attempted to kill his wife and his daughter. Learned counsel further contended that even if the version of the prosecution is taken to be true that the appellant hit his mother-in-law with a fire wood stick, the case, at best, would fall within the ambit of Section 304 Part-I