Back
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
E. Chandraiah – Appellant
Versus
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner joined the respondents’ Corporation as a conductor in the year 1997 under the displaced employees’ quota on regular basis and working under the control of the 4th respondent Depot. While the petitioner was conducting the bus service of the 3rd respondent Depot on 29.07.2015 from Srisailam to JBS, Secunderabad, the bus was checked three (03) times and the checking authorities could not detect any irregularities in the work of the petitioner, as such, did not issue any charge memo on the spot. However, the petitioner was served with a charge mem
The court emphasized that charges of misconduct must be supported by substantial evidence and that the prescribed procedures must be followed. The court also highlighted the principle that the punish....
Disciplinary actions must be clearly justified and charges appropriately framed; reliance on benefit of doubt requires correct application in penalties.
If the charge against an employee is not proved, the employee is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and other attendant benefits, but not to backwages.
Disciplinary action against an employee must be based on enumerated misconduct; failure to issue correct tickets constitutes valid grounds for penalty.
Point of law: punishment imposed on the petitioner by way of removal from service is shockingly disproportionate to the charge of closing the SR prematurely and this requires to be interfered with by....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
