ORDER:

Since the parties in both the Writ Petitions are one and the same in the two writ petitions i.e. W.P.No.12345 of 2011 and W.P.No.29128 of 2012, are disposed off through a common order.

2. Heard the learned counsel Mr. T.Praveen Kumar, appearing on behalf of the Petitioner in W.P.No.12345 of 2011, Mr Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.No.29128 of 2012 and learned senior counsel Mr. Deepak Bhaatacharjee appearing on behalf of the respondents in W.P.No.12345 of 2011 and W.P.No.29128 of 2012.

3. The prayer sought for by the Petitioner in W.P.No.12345 of 2011 is as under :

“to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the inaction on the part of the respondents in not restoring the retail dealership of the petitioners situated at Kompally and Madhapur, Rangareddy District, in favour of the petitioner pursuant to the arbitration award Ref. No.DBD/ARB/SS, dated 19-03-2010 is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) & 21 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondent corporation to restore the said dealership.”

4. The prayer sought for by the Petitioner in W.P.No.29128 of 2012 is as under :

“to issue a Writ of Mandamus,