Back
ALOK ARADHE, N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
V. B. Ramsagar – Appellant
Versus
Srijay Constructions – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
1. This Commercial Court Appeal filed under Section 13 of Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 r/w Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short ‘the Act’ hereinafter) arises out of the petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in C.O.P. No. 21 of 2016 on the file of XXIV Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court which was filed challenging the award passed by the sole arbitrator dated 15.02.2012.
BRIEF FACTS:
2. The facts in brief are that respondent No. 1 is a proprietary firm and respondent No. 2 is the proprietor of respondent No. 1/Constructions (hereinafter referred as respondents). The appellant herein had entered into a development agreement originally on 15.05.1996 with respondents for developing land admeasuring 350 sq. yds. in plot bearing No. 44, situated at Methodist Colony, Kundanbagh, Begumpet, Hyderabad.
3. In the said development agreement, there was an understanding to share built up area in the ratio of 32% to the appellant and 68% to the builders i.e. respondent Nos.1 and 2. Thereafter, certain disputes arose among the part
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
Point of Law : Award could also be set aside if it is so unfair and unreasonable that it shocks the conscience of the court. Such award is opposed to public policy and is required to be adjudged void....
The court confirmed that judicial interference in arbitral awards is limited to cases of patent illegality or perverse findings, respecting the finality of arbitration.
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of interference with arbitral awards and the principle that courts should not interfere with arbitral awards unless there is a patent illegality or violation....
The court ruled that arbitration findings are minimally subject to judicial review, confirming compensation awarded for unlawful possession and possession restoration based on the terms of the compro....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
