SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 476

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, J.
Dr. K. Balu – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Health Medical & Family Welfare Department, Hyderabad and Others – Respondents
I.A. No. 1 Of 2023 In/and W.P. No.25505 Of 2018
Decided On : 12-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri Santhapur Satyanarayana Rao.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that government servants facing disciplinary or court proceedings for promotion should be considered in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257, and delay in completing the enquiry should not affect their eligibility for promotion.

Headnote:

Writ Petition - Promotion Issue - G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999 - The court discussed the legal provisions of G.O.Ms.No.257, which provides guidelines for consideration of government servants against whom disciplinary or court proceedings are pending for promotion. The court also referred to a previous decision that emphasized that denial of promotion requires the filing of a charge memo or charge-sheet in a competitive criminal court. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for promotion in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257, without referring to the pending FIR and criminal case against the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a medical officer, sought a writ to declare the respondents' action in not considering him for promotion as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner was suspended and faced a criminal case, but no charge-sheet was filed. The petitioner's juniors were promoted, and he sought consideration for promotion based on G.O.Ms.No.257.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's case for promotion should be considered in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257, without reference to the pending criminal case. The court noted that the rejection of the petitioner's case was due to non-availability of vacancies, not his ineligibility.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's eligibility for promotion despite a pending criminal case and the non-consideration of his case based on G.O.Ms.No.257.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's case for promotion should be considered in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257, and rejection was not due to his ineligibility. The court emphasized that the delay in completing the enquiry should not make the petitioner suffer for promotion.

Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for promotion in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.257, without referring to the pending FIR and criminal case against the petitioner. The writ petition and related miscellaneous petitions were disposed of.

ORDER :

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief :

    “…… to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Additional Director on the ground of pendency of F.I.R.No.35 of 2014 and Crime No. 10/ACB-KNR/2015, dated l6.05.2017 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Additional Director on regular basis without reference to FIR No.35 of 2014 and Crime No.10/ACB-KNR/2015, dated 16.05.2017 …..”.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows :

The petitioner was appointed as Civil Assistant Surgeon (Medical Officer) on 16.11.1989 at Primary Health Centre, Wankidi, Adilabad District, by the 3rd respondent. Thereafter, he was transferred to the Civil Hospital, Chennur, Adilabad District and worked there up to 1995. Subsequently, he was transferred to Area Hospital, Manchiryal, Adilabad District, and worked there up to 2002. Thereafter, again he was transferred to the Community Health Centre, Bellampally, Adilabad District and worked there up to 2004. In 2004, he got a seat for P.G. Course and joined for M.D.Course at Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal and completed his M.D. course in the year 2007. After completion of his PG course, he joined duty at District Head Quarters Hospital, and he was promoted to the post of Deputy Civil Surgeon in the year 2007 and posted as Deputy DM & HO at ITDA, Eturnagaram, Warangal District and worked there up to 2009 and promoted as Municipal Health Officer, Warangal. He has served various places in Tribal and Rural areas of Adilabad and Warangal District, and he was promoted to Civil Surgeon (General Line) and posted as DM & HO, Karimnagar and reported to duty on 04.09.2013 and worked there up to 17.11.2014. Throughout his entire service, there was no complaint against him. While working as DM & HO, Karimnagar, a trap was laid in his office on 17.11.2014. The ACB authorities have recovered the bribe amount of Rs.60,000/- from the Senior Assistant in the office for doing official favour to the defacto-complainant for cancellation of his deputation. After the trap, the scientific method by using samples of phenolphthalein powder and sodium carbonate powder was conducted, and in the said test, he was not proven. However, he was falsely implicated in the ACB case, and even the ACB authorities did not take his version on the day of the trap. Subsequently, on 17.12.2014, the ACB authorities served a notice to him and the same was received by him and also submitted a detailed explanation to the ACB authorities on 24.12.2014. Not satisfied with the explanation, the petitioner was kept under suspension w.e.f. 17.11.2014 and continued under suspension upto 07.06.2017. Based on the FIR, a criminal case was also registered against the petitioner in Cr.No.35/ACB-KNR/2014 and produced him before the II Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases at Hyderabad, and he got bail. The said case is pending adjudication before the Court below. Thereafter, his suspension was revoked, and he was reinstated into service and joined duty on 08.06.2017 and posted as Additional DM & HO, ITDA Utnoor, Adilabad District and working, as such, in the said place till date.

4. While the matter stood thus, the 3rd respondent intended to fill the vacant posts of Additional Directors from the category of Civil Surgeon (General Line)/Civil Surgeon Specialist under the administrative control of DPH & FW, Telangana State, Hyderabad, for the panel year 2017-18 vide proceedings Rc.No.3556/E1B/2018, dated 05.02.2018 duly enclosing the seniority list and provisional seniority list requesting to furnish the confidential reports for the last five years from 2012-13 to 2016-17

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top