SUREPALLI NANDA
P. Srinivas S/o. Kistaiah – Appellant
Versus
A. P. D. D. C. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner filed this writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned proceedings dated 05.03.2013 bearing Lr. No. 171/Personal 1/ 1B of 2009 in rejecting the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2012 by not promoting the petitioner to the post of Deputy Director of the Respondent Organization, as illegal, contrary to law, judicial precedents and constitutional rights and consequently, grant relief of refixing the seniority of the petitioner from the seniority list of the year 2007 in the Grade-II Manager over and above the candidatures of respondents 2 to 5 by granting all the consequential benefits including the post of the Deputy Directorship in the 1st respondent organization.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows :
(a) The petitioner was appointed to the post of Processing Supervisor at Kartal in the year 1993, at that point of time, the appointment was direct with immediate regularization f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.