Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Malay Kumar Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion eligibility of the petitioner (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. impact of pending vigilance case on promotion (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial review of criminal proceedings duration (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. pendency of vigilance case and promotion rights (Para 14 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. delay in criminal trial affecting employment rights (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. court directive for promotion amid pending criminal trial (Para 28 , 29) |
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. A.K. Biswal, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and B.P. Tripathy, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that on being selected, the Petitioner joined as Inspector of Factories & Boilers under the Government of Odisha on 29.01.1993. Further, considering the performance of the Petitioner, he was promoted to the post of Deputy Director of Factories & Boilers as per Notification dated 26.08.2009 of the Government of Odisha in Labour & Employment Department. While the matter stood thus, the Opposite Party No.1 vide letter No.2014 dated 26.3.2019 circulated tentative gradation list in the cadre of Deputy Directors of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
