SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 17

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Sannith Reddy Mandhadi – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India & another – Respondents
W.P.No.2422 OF 2024
Decided on : 26-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.N.Sreedhar Reddy
For the Respondent: Mr.K.V.V. Vedantha Charya

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established is that the pendency of criminal cases should not lead to denial of passport facilities, as per the Passports Act, 1967 and Rule 12 of Passport Rules, 1980, and supported by relevant case law.

Headnote:

Passport Renewal - Criminal Proceedings - Passports Act, 1967, Rule 12 of Passport Rules, 1980

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to renew his passport, which was not being renewed due to pending criminal proceedings against him. The petitioner argued that the pendency of criminal cases should not lead to denial of passport facilities.

Finding of the Court:

The Court opined that pendency of criminal cases should not be a ground to deny passport facilities and that the Respondents cannot refuse passport renewal on this ground. The Court cited various judgments and legal provisions to support its finding.

Issues: The main issue was whether the pendency of criminal cases can be a ground to deny passport renewal.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the Passports Act, 1967 and Rule 12 of Passport Rules, 1980 do not provide for denial of passport facilities based on the pendency of criminal cases. The Court also cited judgments emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the right to travel abroad.

Final Decision: The Court directed the Respondent to consider the petitioner's explanation and pass appropriate orders for passport renewal, subject to certain conditions.

ORDER :

Heard Mr.N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.K.V.V. Vedantha Charya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :

    “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the action of 2nd Respondent in not renewing the passport of petitioner made vide File No.HY7075704548723 dated 22.8.2023, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith renew the passport of the petitioner made vide File No. HY7075704548723 dated 22.8.2023 for a period of 10 years, under Section 10 of Passports Act, 1967 and under Rule 12 of Passport Rules, 1980 without reference to the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner in C.C.No.3674 of 2022 on the file of the Hon’ble II Additional Junior Civil Judge cum II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at LB Nagar and also the Gazette Notification issued by the Central Government vide GSR No 570(E) dated 25.8.1993...”

3. The case of the Petitioner as per the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present Writ Petition in brief, are as follows:

a) The petitioner was issued Passport bearing No. L8717578 on 29.04.2014 which is valid up to 28.04.2024. As the petitioner’s passport was about to expire, an application for its renewal was filed vide File No. HY7075704548723 dated 22.08.2023 and the 2nd respondent, vide letter in Ref.No. SCN316068225/23 dated 28.10.2023 sought clarification from the petitioner for issuing the renewed passport on the ground of adverse police report, that the petitioner was involved in a criminal case vide FIR No. 465 of 2022 and that the said crime is now registered as C.C.No. 3674 of 2022.

b) Thereafter, as the file was still pending with the 2nd Respondent, the petitioner has approached the office of 2nd Respondent on 19.01.2023 and then the petitioner was informed that his passport would not be renewed until the finalization of criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner in C.C No. 3674 of 2022.

c) Furthermore, the Passport Authority can refuse to issue the passport only if an applicant is convicted during the period of 5 years immediately preceding the date of application for offences involving moral turpitude and sentenced for imprisonment of not less than two years. Even as per the Police Verification Report and the notice issued by the 2nd Respondent, the criminal case registered against the petitioner is pending trial, that too with regard to an offence of trespass. Therefore the 2nd Respondent cannot keep the petitioner’s application pending for renewal of passport nor can refuse to grant such renewal. Aggrieved by the action of 2nd respondent in not renewing the passport of petitioner made vide File No. HY7075704548723 dated 22.08.2023, the present Writ Petition is filed.

PERUSED THE RECORD.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:

4. A bare perusal of the contents of the notice dated 28.10.2023 issued to the petitioner by the 2nd respondent herein indicates that the petitioner is involved in Crime Number 465 of 2022 under Sections 427, 447, 506 read with 34 IPC of P.S. LB Nagar in C.C.No.3674/2023 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District Court, and the petitioner is called upon vide the said notice of the 234 IPC of P.S. LB Nagar in C.C.No.3674/2023 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District Court, and the petitioner is called upon vide the said notice of the 234 IPC of P.S. LB Nagar in C.C.No.3674/2023 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District Court, and the petitioner is called upon vide the said notice of the 234 IPC of P.S. LB Nagar in C.C.No.3674/2023 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District Court, and the petitioner is called upon vide the said notice of the 234 IPC of P

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon Back to top