SUREPALLI NANDA
Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. R.N. Reddy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. G. Ravi Mohan, learned Senior Designated Counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent.
2. PRAYER:
“To issue Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order dated 20.11.2014 passed in ATA No. 349(1) of 2010 by the 1stnd respondent Tribunal and quash the same as illegal and unjust and in consequence direct the 2 respondent to pay the dues assessed by the petitioner through order dated 30.04.2010 u/s 7B of the Act.”
3. PERUSED THE RECORD:
“19. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposed the arguments of the counsel for appellant and contended that the burden lies on the appellant to produce the records and to satisfy the contention raised by the respondent. In absence of these documents the respondent rightly came to the conclusion and passed order. He furth
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.