Back
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Sajjan Kumar Agarwal, son of late Jay Chand Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.11.2010 passed under section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Ranchi whereby he has been pleased to direct the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs. 1,42,104.00 and also Challenging the appellate order dated 17.09.2015, passed in ATA No. 100(18)2011, by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal has been pleased to dismiss the appeal filed by the petitioner.
Arguments of the petitioner
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an inspection was conducted in the premises of the petitioner and a report was prepared. The report has been placed on record by the respondents in their supplementary counter affidavit dated 02.09.2024. The report is dated 15.02.1999 as Annexure-A. She submits that in the said report it has been mentioned that 21 employees were found working, However, there is no mention that the list of employees was also prepared and the list of employees was a part of the report. She submits that the first page of th
The authority must consider jurisdictional issues and provide specific findings on employee count and applicability of the Act when assessing provident fund dues.
The importance of considering evidence and applying the provisions of the Act properly in reaching a decision.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proper consideration of documentary evidence and the requirement for clear findings based on the available evidence in determi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner to decide the entitlement of an employee to become a member and the date from which the e....
An appeal under the Employees' Provident Fund Act is premature if there is no determination of dues, as required by Section 7A.
The Commissioner must conduct an independent inquiry under Section 7A of the Act, ensuring compliance with natural justice principles before determining amounts due from employers.
The duty of the principal employer to provide details of employees' provident fund, the necessity of contractors as parties for adjudicating disputes, and the importance of granting a proper hearing ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of principles of natural justice in the decision-making process and the entitlement of the petitioner to a fresh consideration of the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
