Back
M. LAXMAN, G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Shaik Nazeer Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. - This Criminal Appeal is preferred against the judgment and sentence of imprisonment, in S.C.No.463 of 2009, dtd. 29/10/2013, on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, wherein the sole accused/appellant found guilty for the offences punishable under Ss. 302 and 380 of IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and shall pay a fine of Rs.10, 000.00 for the offence punishable under Sec. 302 of IPC and in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months. Further, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and also shall pay a fine of Rs.5, 000.00 for the offence punishable under Sec. 380 of IPC and in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months.
2. The brief facts of the case of the prosecution are that the deceased G.Babu Rao as well as the accused were working as sweepers in Railway Mail Service situated in II floor of General Post Office, JN Road, Abids, Hyderabad. While so, on the intervening night of 2/3/2/2009, the accused murdered the deceased Babu Rao in the
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of events in cases based on circumstantial evidence, and the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasona....
The judgment emphasizes the requirement for a complete chain of evidence in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the inadmissibility of confessions, and the need to connect recovered material obje....
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of evidence, including motive, in cases based on circumstantial evidence, and the evidence must be cogent, trustworthy, and exclude every possible hypo....
Convictions under circumstantial evidence require a complete and unbroken chain of proof; mere suspicion is insufficient for establishing guilt.
In a criminal trial based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances that excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Suspicion c....
Circumstantial evidence must form an unbroken chain pointing solely to the guilt of the accused; confessions made in police custody are inadmissible unless they lead to the discovery of facts.
Another important aspect to be considered in a case resting on circumstantial evidence is the lapse of time between the point when the accused and deceased were seen together and when the deceased is....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must provide a complete and unbroken chain of evidence that conclusively points to the guilt of the accused, failing which the accu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
