SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 744

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Kallem Niranjan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary, Revenue, Hyderabad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Heard Sri B.Chandrasen Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4, Sri P.Harinath Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.6, Sri K.Srinivas, learned Counsel for respondent Nos.7 and 8 and Sri Kuriti Bhaskar Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos.13 and 14.

2. The above Writ Petition was filed questioning the order passed by respondent No.2 in case No.F1/5550/2013, dtd. 25/3/2014, setting aside the order, dtd. 20/9/2000, passed by respondent No.3 in proceedings No.J/1735/2000 and remanding the matter back to respondent No.3 to re-examine the case of the protected tenants.

3. The brief undisputed facts, that are relevant for disposal of the present Writ Petition, are as under:-

4. One Sri Kallem Bal Reddy, was recorded as occupant and protected tenant of the land admeasuring Acs.27.30 gts., and Acs.2.17 gts, situated in Sy.Nos.88 and 257 of Balapur Village, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioners herein made a claim for grant of Occupancy Rights Certificate (for short 'ORC') under Sec. 7 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short 'the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top