SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 1165

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
Syed Taheruddin – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P, Rep. by its Secretary – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition for quashing order based on jurisdictional errors. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. claim of protected tenancy and implications of orc. (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments regarding possession and registration of rights. (Para 6 , 7)
4. delay in seeking legal remedies and implications. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. importance of reasons in judicial and quasi-judicial decisions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. judicial review of administrative and quasi-judicial decisions. (Para 14 , 15)
7. restoration of orc and quashing of erroneous order. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

ORDER :

SUREPALLI NANDA, J.

Heard the Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and the Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of Respondents No.1 to 4 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents.

2. The Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer in W.P.Nos.14112 of 2014 as under :

“to call for records pertaining to the order dated 01.02.2014 passed in Case No.F1/2200/2009, from the office of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the said order by issuing a writ or direction more particularly writ of Certiorari and declaring the same as arbitray, void, illegal and without ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top