The court affirmed that police protection can be ordered to implement civil injunctions, emphasizing the judiciary's role in upholding property rights against unlawful interference.

JUDGMENT

LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J. - W.P.No.271 of 2020 is filed by defendant Nos.2 and 3 in O.S.No.11 of 2014, to issue Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, more particularly, respondent No.4 in trying to demolish the structures erected by petitioners and dispossessing them in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 0-11 guntas each in Sy.No.435/2 situated at Gundlapochampally Village, Medchal Malkajgiri District as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Right to Property under the Article 300 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 not to demolish the structures in land admeasuring Ac 0-11 guntas each in Sy.No.435/2 situated at Gundlapochampally Village, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

2. W.P.No.32891 of 2022 is filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.11 of 2014, to issue Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the official respondents, more particularly, respondent Nos.5 to 7 in involving the civil disputes, thereby, threatening the petitioner to settle the matter with the respondent Nos.8 and 9 in respect of property covered under the judgment and decree dtd. 29/10/2019 in O.S.No.11 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Medchal, as it being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct respondent No.2 to take stringent action against respondent Nos.5 to 7 for committing constant interference in civil disputes by threatening the petitioner to settle the matter with respondent Nos.8 and 9, further, to direct respondent No.5 to provide police protection to the extent of land admeasuring Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.435/1 Part, situated at Gundlapochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

3. Before going into the respective submissions made by the counsel on either side, this Court deems it appropriate to dwell in to the few facts, which are necessary for adjudication of these matters.

4. The petitioner in W.P.No.32891 of 2022 has filed a suit in O.S.No.11 of 2014 seeking injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the property admeasuring Ac.1.00guntas in Survey No.435/1 part situated at Gundlapochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Along with the said suit he has also filed I.A.No.47 of 2014 seeking interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner/plaintiff over the schedule mentioned property and the Court below vide order dtd. 22/4/2014 has granted ad-interim injunction. Aggrieved by the said injunction order, the defendants in the above referred suit have filed an appeal vide C.M.A.No.46 of 2014 and the same was dismissed by order dtd. 3/1/2017. Challenging the same, the defendants have preferred a revision vide C.R.P.No.1614 of 2018 and the same was also dismissed on 27/4/2018. In spite of the same, when the defendants were interfering with his peaceful possession over the schedule mentioned property. The petitioner herein, who is the plaintiff in the above referred suit, has filed an application i.e., I.A.No.685 of 2017 seeking police protection. Thereupon, the Court below by Order dtd. 8/3/2018, has directed respondent No.5 herein to provide police protection to the schedule mentioned property. Thereafter, the above referred suit was decreed on 29/10/2019 in favour of the petitioner. When respondent No.5 failed to grant police protection, the petitioner came up before this Court by filing W.P.No.11184 of 2019 wherein this Court by Order dtd. 25/6/2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 has passed a